Enforcement in the EU
Published: September 10, 2013
Author: admin

Debt Recovery Across EU Borders

Is a company that owes you money based in another country in the European Union?  Perhaps an individual debtor has dissipated his assets in England and moved abroad within the EU to frustrate your attempts to enforce locally.

Unfortunately, these are not uncommon scenarios that can complicate enforcement to the point that the commercial viability of continuing is extinguished. While you may be successful in obtaining judgment in England this is often only the beginning of an arduous and protracted journey which can see legal costs increase significantly.

There are, however, procedures in place for uncontested claims that can facilitate cross border litigation within the EU as well as simplifying the enforcement process.

European Payment Order

The European Payment Order (“EPO”) aims to provide a quick, standard and cheap method for pursuing an uncontested debt throughout the EU, for both small and high value claims.

This procedure applies when you are claiming money from someone who does not dispute that they owe you the money you are claiming. To obtain an EPO you must complete a standard form providing details of the parties, the amount you are seeking and evidence relating to the debt. Unlike the European Enforcement Order procedure below, there is no requirement to obtain judgment before submitting your application for an EPO.

Once you have obtained the EPO it becomes automatically enforceable in every EU country, with the exception of Denmark, and will be capable of being enforced in accordance with debt recovery systems in the jurisdiction in which you seek to enforce.  However, please note that an EPO is capable of being challenged by the debtor, in which case the debt may move outside the scope of the EPO procedure and into the usual litigation process of the applicable jurisdiction, which may be determined for example by contract or the debtor’s domicile.

European Enforcement Order

An alternative to the EPO is the European Enforcement Order (“EEO”). This enables you to enforce an existing judgment in another EU member state (except Denmark). So, once you have obtained judgment here in England you can apply for an EEO certificate that will accompany your judgment rendering it readily enforceable. There is no need to register or convert the judgment. The balance due under the EEO will be recovered in accordance with the rules of enforcement of the particular member state in which you seek to enforce.

The EEO procedure only applies to civil and commercial claims which are uncontested. For the purposes of this procedure a claim shall be regarded as uncontested if:

  • the debtor has expressly agreed to it by admission or by means of a settlement which has been approved by a court or concluded before a court in the course of proceedings; or
  • the debtor has never objected to it in the course of the court proceedings; or
  • the debtor has not appeared or been represented at a court hearing regarding that claim after having initially objected to the claim in the course of the court proceedings; or
  • the debtor has expressly agreed to it in an authentic instrument.

For your application for an EEO to be successful, however, there are strict requirements that you must ensure are complied with during the initial claim leading up to judgment and thereafter. These relate to, for example, the service of the claim form and judgment. Furthermore, if the matter is subsequently contested it may be brought back before the original national court and proceed as a defended action. In this respect, it is essential that you are able to evidence that the claim has been served in accordance with the EEO procedure to reduce the risk of any problems arising.

European Small Claim Procedure

The European Small Claim Procedure (“ESCP”) is designed to reduce costs and speed up the process for making low value claims against defendants based in other EU member states. It is not available for bankruptcy and winding up, employment matters or social security claims and is only available where the value of the claim does not exceed 2000E excluding interest, disbursements and costs.

Unless the Court orders otherwise, it is usually a written procedure and unlike the determination of  small claim disputes in England, under the ESCP legal costs can be recovered from the paying party, subject to reasonableness and proportionality.

Within 30 days of receiving the defendant’s reply to your claim (if any) the court must either issue a judgment, request further details in writing from either party, or summon the parties to an oral hearing.

Once you obtain judgment, you can request the Court to fill out a form to make your judgment enforceable in other Member States of the EU, without any further formalities. As above, you will then need to carry out enforcement in accordance with the rules of the Member State in which you seek to enforce.

Further considerations on enforcement

Once you have an EPO, and EEO or an ESPC judgment, enforcement in another Member State can still be refused but only if it is irreconcilable with another judgment in that Member State between the same parties.

On a more practical side, before deciding whether to pursue a defendant, by whatever means, it is important to know its status. For example, is it a company or an individual? There can be a tendency to assume the answer without research and if you commence proceedings against the wrong entity you will most likely have to start again no matter how far you get. Furthermore, it is paramount to first establish whether the defendant is solvent or has assets against which you could potentially enforce a judgment. Remember, a judgment ordering A to pay B a sum of money is effectively meaningless if A has no means to pay.

A City Law Firm Limited’s litigation team have a good track record of resolving these disputes or, where settlement is not possible, recovering the undisputed debts

For more information contact us…

0207 426 0382

enquiries@acitylawfirm.com 

” ”

Silenced by Fear: A Guide to Addressing Sexual Harassment from Those in Power

Introduction Sexual harassment can occur in many contexts, not just in the workplace. When the harasser is in a position of power—be it a manager, investor, joint venture partner, or any influential figure—it can create a climate of fear that discourages victims from...

From partners to rivals | Protecting your company using restrictive covenants

If a founder or shareholders or senior managers relationship sours, things can go wrong very quickly causing the company distraction and financial losses. This is compounded if on exit the departing individual seeks to poach clients or staff seeks to work with a...

Navigating Fashion’s Legal Landscape: Essential Guidance for Designers and Entrepreneurs

Introduction: Fashion Week is more than just runways and glamorous designs it's also a pivotal time for designers, entrepreneurs, and brands to reassess their legal strategies. As the fashion industry faces unique challenges heading into 2025, including new...

From Partners to Rivals: Protecting Your Company through restrictive covenants

Today, we’re tackling an issue that can make or break your business—restrictive covenants and their role in protecting your company during shareholder, director or staff disputes. We will touch on their importance, how these should be incorporated into your documents...

Protecting AI Innovations: Strategies and Guidelines – Part 2

As Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to evolve, its intersection with Intellectual Property (IP) law has become a crucial consideration for innovators. The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has a set of detailed guidelines to evaluate if AI inventions are...

The Life of a Disruptive Lawyer: Innovating Legal Practice in Emerging Technologies ran by a Mum & Female Founder

In the staid and often stolid world of law, disruption is not a term often associated with the legal profession. Yet, at A City Law Firm , disruption is our modus operandi. From pioneering payment plans to engaging with cutting-edge technology, we have redefined what...

Protecting AI Innovations: Strategies and Guidelines – Part 1

As Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to evolve, its intersection with Intellectual Property (IP) law has become a crucial consideration for innovators. The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has a set of detailed guidelines to evaluate if AI inventions are...

Tackling workplace toxicity

In today’s interconnected work environment, whether through face-to-face interactions, virtual meetings on Teams, or other communication platforms, issues such as derogatory comments, bad-mouthing employers and management, bullying and discrimination are prevalent....

Navigating the metaverse | Potential challenges for employers and employees in the UK

With the rapid advancement of technology, the concept of the metaverse is no longer confined to the realm of science fiction it is here. As virtual reality, augmented reality, and other immersive technologies converge, the metaverse is becoming increasingly tangible....

IP Licenses: When do you need one and what are the essential terms it must have?

As technology lawyers working in emerging technology, our biggest value is protecting and commercialising the founders IP The why ? In the fast-paced world of intellectual property (IP), safeguarding your creations is paramount. Whether you’re an inventor, artist, or...